Schubert
Yesterday, my Schubert CD had its U.S. release, and not entirely coincidentally, I began a run of performances of the A Major Sonata, this one in a house concert in London. Schubert, once again, is looming large.
Not that he had stopped doing so, really. But it was wonderful to be reminded yesterday that you can be overwhelmed by what you think you know. There are certain pieces which give the impression, at their outset, of embarking on a journey. The Schubert A Major is one of them, and the listener (and player, who is hopefully also listening) is richly rewarded for making the trip, for it takes off in unexpected — shocking, really - directions, and leaves us, in the profoundest sense, somewhere other than where we began.
Schubert died at the age of 31, a mere two years older than I currently am. (!) As I’ve said, I neither know what “maturity” means, nor think I possess it, but the astonishing development that took place in this young man’s final years has brought the subject to mind again. (Just to be clear, I’m not for a moment suggesting that maturity might be all that separates me from Schubert: there is the small matter of his genius.) Many have said that Schubert’s premature death is the greatest loss to have befallen music; I’m unsure. Were the feverish intensity and celestial lyricism that characterize Schubert’s final year a step along a path towards an unfathomed musical language? Or were those qualities available to him only because he knew the end was near, and because he was quickly drowning in his own unhappiness?
We’ll never know, of course. What I do believe firmly is that what distinguishes late Schubert from any other music is not the feelings themselves — many have suffered greatly, after all. Nor is it is compositional ability — great as it was, it did not exceed that of Mozart or Beethoven. What I believe is without precedent and remains unequaled is Schubert’s access to his inner life — his subconscious, even. Even the twentieth century failed to produce a howl as primal as the one that disrupts the songfulness of the A Major Sonata’s second movement. Is this, perhaps, maturity — an awareness of what lies beneath so absolute that it can be put on paper? (Again, genius surely helps.) Or perhaps the meaning of maturity can be found in the open-heartedness of the last movement — music of pure generosity. After Schubert’s very soul is crushed in the slow movement, where exactly does this come from?
I am perpetually wary of drawing connections between a composer’s life and work. (Exhibit A: Heiligenstadt Testament — Beethoven’s Second Symphony.) But I cannot hear the A Major Sonata (or Schwanengesang, or the String Quintet, or the C Major Symphony, or or or…) without being made aware of how much pain Schubert must have endured. Someone once said to me that Schubert’s music is sad when it is in minor keys, and tragic when it is in major keys, and it’s true — even the music that is consoling contains a knowledge of something terrible.
I am unwilling to say that I am grateful to Schubert for enduring whatever it was that made these masterworks possible. But for their existence I am deeply grateful. This is not merely music you listen to; it resides inside you, speaks to you, evolves with you. Please: stop reading, and go listen to Schubert.
October 14th, 2009 at 2:50 pm
Thanks to your agent, I had the good fortune to prepare a preview piece for this CD at the end of August (). I was particularly interested in it, since I had been pursuing the topic of the “virtual recital” on my site. Ironically, in writing my piece I was less interested in questions of subjective and social context (that often occupy me) and more in the extent to which D. 840 established a “base camp” for D. 959 (having taken Mount Fuji as a metaphor for dealing with Schubert’s “heavenly length”). I have no idea whether or not my thoughts hold any water in your book, but I figured that, at the very least, I should make the URL available to you and your readers!
October 14th, 2009 at 2:53 pm
I see that the URL I inserted in my comment was filtered by your blog software. The hyperlink on my name for this comment (but not the previous one, which got garbled) points to my home page. From there one can click on the “keyboard music” topic. The piece about the Wigmore CD should be on the first page of results!
October 15th, 2009 at 6:35 am
Thanks, Stephen. The “climbing a mountain” metaphor is one I’ve often used myself, when talking about the A Major. I absolutely love the C Major on its own merits, and thus don’t tend to think of it as preparatory. But I don’t want to split hairs - I’m delighted you’ve been listening to Schubert (generally, and the CD, specifically) and that you’re writing about it with such passion.
December 3rd, 2009 at 8:35 am
Thank you for reviving my interest and love for Schubert’s music
January 18th, 2010 at 10:34 pm
You write some very interesting posts–I hope you get back to updating the blog more often.
I’m looking forward to seeing you playing Brahms 2nd in Pittsburgh in a few weeks.
March 9th, 2010 at 8:43 pm
I am thankful for the attention you bringing to Schubert’s great works; his contributions are all too easily overlooked by the musical community.
Like Mr. Jaffe above I too looked forward to your Brahms, and may I say it far exceeded every expectation I had for it. The slow movement was particularly memorable. Thank you for programming this work. It seems to be set aside these days (or am I imagining this) in favor of shorter, more recognizable concerti. I would like to read your comments sometime on the nature of programming in our present day. Also, what has become of the piano recital? As a youthful artist you are certainly an ambassador for classical music everywhere you go. What are your perceptions of public awareness of classical music in general as you tour the US? In a day when the mainstream media treat serious music, opera, etc. like the plague, what if anything do you think can be done to reinvigorate and reintroduce a sensitivity to and popular appreciation of our great western tradition?